Do Autistic Children Dissociate?
Being diagnosed with autism and with Dissociative Identity Disorder I reflected on the hundreds of children and adults I’ve worked with as an autism consultant since 1996. Given dissociation is such a natural process in young children that DID cannot reliably be diagnosed in early childhood, was dissociation something only non-autistic children did? If autistic children also farted, yawned, ate, toileted, slept, breathed, did they also have this natural ability to dissociate? Could their autism be complicated by issues of dissociation, depersonalisation, derealisation? And what might these look like in someone with autism?
First, some definitions:
What is dissociation?
Dissociation is a word that is used to describe the disconnection or lack of connection between things usually associated with each other. Dissociated experiences are not integrated into the usual sense of self, resulting in discontinuities in conscious awareness (Anderson & Alexander, 1996; Frey, 2001; International Society for the Study of Dissociation, 2002; Maldonado, Butler, & Spiegel, 2002; Pascuzzi & Weber, 1997; Rauschenberger & Lynn, 1995; Simeon et al., 2001; Spiegel & Cardeña, 1991; Steinberg et al., 1990, 1993). In severe forms of dissociation, disconnection occurs in the usually integrated functions of consciousness, memory, identity, or perception. For example, someone may think about an event that was tremendously upsetting yet have no feelings about it. Clinically, this is termed emotional numbing, one of the hallmarks of post-traumatic stress disorder. Dissociation is a psychological process commonly found in persons seeking mental health treatment (Maldonado et al., 2002).
Dissociation may affect a person subjectively in the form of “made†thoughts, feelings, and actions. These are thoughts or emotions seemingly coming out of nowhere, or finding oneself carrying out an action as if it were controlled by a force other than oneself (Dell, 2001). Typically, a person feels “taken over†by an emotion that does not seem to makes sense at the time. Feeling suddenly, unbearably sad, without an apparent reason, and then having the sadness leave in much the same manner as it came, is an example. Or someone may find himself or herself doing something that they would not normally do but unable to stop themselves, almost as if they are being compelled to do it. This is sometimes described as the experience of being a “passenger†in one’s body, rather than the driver.
What is depersonalization?
Depersonalization is the sense of being detached from, or “not in†one’s body. This is what is often referred to as an “out-of-body†experience. However, some people report rather profound alienation from their bodies, a sense that they do not recognize themselves in the mirror, recognize their face, or simply feel not “connected†to their bodies in ways which are challenging to articulate (Frey, 2001; Guralnik, Schmeidler, & Simeon, 2000; Maldonado et al., 2002; Simeon et al., 2001; Spiegel & Cardeña; Steinberg, 1995).
What is derealization?
Derealization is the sense of the world not being real. Some people say the world looks phony, foggy, far away, or as if seen through a veil. Some people describe seeing the world as if they are detached, or as if they were watching a movie (Steinberg, 1995).
from: http://www.isst-d.org/education/faq-dissociation.htm#dissoc
Given children with autism often battle with more intense frustration, disability, environmental clashes and experience more intensive, often incomprehensible early interventions than non-autistic children, would autistic children dissociate even moreso than non-autistic children?
Even more pertinent is the question whether, like non-autistic children do, would autistic children naturally outgrow dissociation to become whole, integral selves? What would that look like in an autistic child at age 10, age 15, age 25? Would we deem them more autistic because of that, autistic AND emotionally/behaviorally disturbed?
Let’s consider some of the 20 items on the checklist for dissociative disorders in children:
2. Child goes into a daze or trance-like state at times or often appears “spaced-out.”
3. Child may go from being shy to being outgoing, from feminine to masculine, from timid to aggressive.
4. Child may forget the names of friends, teachers or other important people, loses possessions or gets easily lost.
5. Child loses track of time or becomes confused about when something has happened.
6. Child shows marked day-to-day or even hour-to-hour variations in his or her skills
7. Child shows rapid regressions in age-level behavior
8. Child has a difficult time learning from experience, e.g. explanations, normal discipline or punishment do not change his or her behavior.
10. Child refers to himself or herself in the third person ( .g. as she or her) or when talking about self, or at times insists on being called by a different name.
11. Child has rapidly changing physical complaints such as headache or upset stomach. For example, he or she may complain of a headache one minute and seem to forget about it the next.
13. Child may deliberately injure self at times.
14. Child reports hearing voices that talk to him or her. The voices may be friendly or angry and may come form “imaginary companions” or sound like the voices of parents, friends or teachers.
16. Child has intense outbursts of anger, often without apparent cause and may display unusual physical strength during these episodes.
17. Child sleepwalks frequently.
18. Child has unusual nighttime experiences
19. Child frequently talks to him or herself, may use a different voice or argue with self at times.
20. Child has two or more distinct and separate personalities that take control over the child’s behavior.
Many children with autism will not be in ongoing experiences they find invasive, overwhelming or traumatic. But others will. Would we cast off an consideration of additional complications of entrenched dissociative patterns because we could not imagine our good intentions as traumatic?
Perhaps we can’t imagine that experiences like entrapment without communication, judgments of our intelligence based on involuntary behaviors or disability, social segregation, discrimination, bullying, intensive and intrusive interventions, restraint and aversives, invasion of our bedroom by therapists who physically controlled and filmed us, being mourned over as if ones self did not yet exist and the like, could collectively amount to trauma?
If we were imprisoned at the hands of captors who did the same to us between age 2-5 would we say the same? But if you were a faceblind child who saw your parents in visual fragments, heard their speech without meaning, had no neurological capacity to make sense of their emotional expression or visually fragmented, seemingly meaningless actions, would you glean their good intentions to ‘save you’? And if not, how might this shape dissociation? Would you be worse for it, or somehow appear to gain functions because you had had to function in spite of dissociation just to get rid of these inexplicable intrusions?
What if you were also born with gut and immune disorders, had to regularly undergo injections, probing by gastroenteritis, be hooked up to IV or swallow 20 pills a day with no comprehension of why? Even worse, what if some carer, determined to ‘cure’ your autism presumed wrongly that because of your diagnosis you were one of this group when you had in fact never had these health disorders? What would be your journey with dissociation? Would it present you as even more autistic? Would you appear less so because finally that appeared to get these people off your case?
Uncomfortable questions but important ones.
How much of what presents as ‘stimming’, ‘self hypnosis’, ‘detachability’, sensory hyposensitivity, no pain response, involuntary avoidance, diversion and retaliation responses, extremely divided abilities, inability to consistently repeat a function we had an hour ago or last week, aimless wandering, inexplicable self injury, sudden inexplicable meltdowns, sudden switching, self directed chatter …. might we dare to at least consider in the context of both autism AND dissociative processes?
Given that dissociative disorders are on a spectrum from mild to moderate (such as DD-Nos) to severe (such as DID) and given that a child who recovers from an early dissociative disorder can then reignite it due to trauma in mid childhood, could this play any part in regressions and breakdowns of autistic children who were subject to traumatic bullying, repeated restraint or invasive and aversive therapies? If so would there come a day where we might check for dissociative disorders as a co-morbid disorder in those with autism so we can address it, even (perhaps especially) in functionally non-verbal children instead of presuming the whole package to be just ‘the autism’?
Could it be that someone with autism who is already exceptional at dissociating, has developed it to a degree, depth and duration beyond non-autistic children who is then severely abused or bullied may be more likely to develop DID in addition to their autism? By contrast, someone without autism who is also adept at the natural capacity to dissociate which is present from age 2-4 if they were severely abused at that time could find themselves dissociating involuntarily as a protection against trauma. Could it be there are those with autism who regularly dissociate volitionally through stimming, those for whom this has become habitual, addictive and involuntary, those for whom it is triggered by overload and social invasion and those for whom it was made worse via things like bullying?
Donna Williams, BA Hons, Dip Ed.
Author, artist, singer-songwriter, screenwriter.
Autism consultant and public speaker.
You can find more info at my website http://www.donnawilliams.netincluding my consultation page for DID where I offer online Peer Support.
The less interesting part of my response first:
I agree with most of your post but I have to take issue with your description of DD-NOS. DD-NOS doesn’t mean anything about severity. It just means the person’s dissociative traits don’t match the patterns of any of the other conditions listed. I was repeatedly, over the course of many years, diagnosed with severe dissociation, coded as DD-NOS. What that means is that the dissociation could be as severe as in any other dissociative condition, but wasn’t exactly depersonalization disorder, derealization disorder, dissociative fugue, or DID.
It’s sort of like my doctor explained to me once about neuro-muscular conditions. There’s only a very small number overall that have a name. Everything else doesn’t have a name. The fact that they don’t have a name (and my have an -NOS-like category when they’re put into the ICD codes) doesn’t mean anything at all about how severe they are compared to the ones that do have a name.
It’s the same thing with dissociation. Severe dissociation can take many forms and go in many directions. All -NOS means is that it isn’t one of the very small number of forms of dissociation that have official categories for them. It means absolutely nothing about severity. It’s a common misconception though, not just about dissociation but about anything else with an -NOS category. It’s like people think if there’s no name for it yet then it’s less severe than the things with a name, and nothing could be further from the truth. -NOS just means “no name for it”. Otherwise I wouldn’t have had people constantly telling me I had a very severe form of dissociation, and yet diagnosing it as DD-NOS. I know it’s a small correction but it’s a common misunderstanding that can cause problems for people. People are always confusing type with severity when it comes to dissociation and many other things.
The more interesting part of my response (at least to me):
As far as what caused it, probably multiple things, but the biggest thing was having a severe pain condition — never getting below 6/10 on the pain scale — growing up. That wasn’t treated until I was in my twenties. That meant dissociation was the only way I had to deal with it. Also, there was probably a physiological component because the particular pain condition I have results in a neurological disconnect between the person and their body, which would just heighten any distancing effect that was already going to exist. So I definitely dissociated constantly and in a big way for as long as I can remember.
When the dissociation was finally recognized, they basically said that I had a biological predisposition to severe dissociation. And yet they never even thought of the fact that I was dealing with a kind of pain that basically starts in the brain and feels as if it’s everywhere. Any time I got close to my body, it was like getting hit with an excruciating blast of pain (which originated in the brain and therefore couldn’t be fixed by doing anything to my body — not until anticonvulsants came out as a pain treatment for that kind of thing, anyway), so I stayed away as much as I could even after I was beginning to ‘incarnate’ as I put it. This affected me far more than the abuse that they were trying to pin the dissociation on when I got older.
(I wrote about the pain and my responses to it in a post called The Summer Thing on my blog, for more details on all this. I have to get off the computer for now.)
these are good points.
personally, as someone with DID who knows people suffering from DD-Nos (and for some it IS suffering) I can see that it really comes down to the individual re severity. It’s the literature that says DD-Nos is a less severe condition than DID but they should probably say the DID is more entrenched, perhaps more complex rather than more severe, because one person could have relatively mild DID or a great disposition and opportunities with which to work with it, and a person with DD-Nos may have that extremely and lack the disposition and opportunities to deal with it well.
Re pain and dissociation, I completely agree. As a child with primary immune deficiencies since 6 mths old a lot of my childhood meant double ear infections, throat infections to the point it was saddening every time I swallowed if not felt I might choke from the inflammation, chest infections so long term I had bloody mucus and it hurt to breath, severe gut pains from maldigestion, juvenile arthritis and myalgic pain from around 9 and migraines by 19. So I definitely feel the original splitting was highly associated with pain not directly or solely associated with abuse.
Oh yes, it definitely does cause suffering for me. It helps with pain, but it also distorted my relationship with myself and the rest of the world for a long time, so I was paying a high price for that distance. In my case, I only started not dissociating (or doing so less) when I finally got adequate pain treatment, but even now it’s easy to slip back into it the moment my pain ramps up high enough. And sometimes I’ll even slide into it deliberately because I know it’s better than what I’m dealing with, but it’s not a nice choice to have to make. Other times it’s involuntary.
Sometimes I don’t even realize how dissociated I’ve become in some ways. When someone injected a local anesthetic into just one of the three branches of my trigeminal nerve (I have trigeminal neuralgia as well as the central pain condition), it felt like I had a face. Even though two thirds of the nerve were still doing their pain thing, the difference numbing one bit meant was enormous. When the numbing wore off, I started crying, not because of the pain, but because of the involuntary dissociation that went with it. I felt like someone was slamming a castle door shut in front of me and I was stuck on the inside after having been let out for a few hours for the first time in years. And even as connected as I’ve been able to become with pain treatment, I know that that door is still shut in some ways. The dissociation is far less severe than it was with no pain treatment at all, but that chain-locked door still there and I’m still on the wrong side of it. And that much seems involuntary, I’ve never figured a way to let it down.
My assessment of the difference between individuals diagnosed with DID and those DDNOS has simply been the level of dissociative amnesia between the parts/alters. Many of the DDNOS group are what I would consider to be ‘functionally multiple’ in that dissociation, fractured identity, switching and managing parts are still big issues, although the amount of information lost between parts is lower than that required for a diagnosis of DID. In some cases also while the sense of having more than one person inside may be strong, there is never the switching where someone else takes control that is part of the condition DID. To me the distinction seems erroneous considering that both groups have the same kinds of struggles and need the same kinds of support in many respects. I’ve also personally not observed any difference in severity of the two conditions, someone with DDNOS may have such a fluid and chaotic system that their functioning is impaired far more severely than a person with DID who’s system is stable, strongly role bound (the one who goes to work, the one who cleans house etc) and compensating for the amnesiac issues successfully eg talking internally or using journals or therapy to communicate. The diagnosis of DDNOS is also used far more frequently than DID, which to me suggests that it might be useful to lower some of the criteria that determine a diagnosis of DID so that folks dealing with issues around dissociative multiplicity and fracturing all get the same terminology and hopefully all feel like their condition is recognised. That’s my two cents worth!
“My assessment of the difference between individuals diagnosed with DID and those DDNOS has simply been the level of dissociative amnesia between the parts/alters.”
Katherine, thank you for writing that.
That is exactly what I’ve been thinking.
The proposed DSM 5 criteria for DID has widened the net a bit, I think. I fit those criteria completely. Maybe when it comes out I’ll be dxed with DID. I’ve recently become aware of my parts and did a bit of research. I thought I fit DID – it is a spectrum after all – but my psychologist was hesitant to use that dx (which i fine, I appreciate her caution).
So looking online, I guess I might be DDNOS with the only difference being that I don’t have the full amnesia between parts.
Thanks again, Zel.